Posts Tagged ‘The-Corporation’

Brett Hurt Leadership Themes from My Talk at The Wharton School

April 5th, 2009 by Brett Hurt Founder and CEO

The Wharton School logo

Earning my MBA from The Wharton School in ‘99 was a transformational experience for me.  A big part of that experience were graduates returning to campus to speak to my class.  So I have returned to the school, once to twice per year (in more recent years, twice), on my own dime, ever since graduating to pay it forward to the best of my ability.  It strikes me that this isn’t unlike shoppers, who we see encouraged to write their own content as they read more reviews, answers, and stories from their peers, receiving value and being motivated to pay it forward (see this study with the Keller Fay Group).

Last Thursday, I spoke from 9am-4:30pm to Dr. Stew Friedman’s leadership and teamwork classes.  Stew has been a mentor for around eight years now.  He authored Total Leadership, an amazing culmination of his life’s work and a book I deployed, with Stew’s help (he graciously visited us in Austin twice, and our London team attended his talk there), to the entire Bazaarvoice staff last year and then this year to all of our new people.  You can read about that experience here, which The New York Times graciously covered.

Every time I return to speak to Stew’s class, I reinvent my talk.  These talks come from the heart, and I prepare for them in the cab ride on the way to speak.  These are the key themes I spoke to on Thursday:

Humility. The single best leadership article that Stew pointed to me in our mentoring meetings was Level 5 Leadership by Jim Collins, author of Good to Great.  It is required reading for our executive team (and his class at Wharton), and I find myself referring to it often.  From the Wall Street meltdown, due to lack of transparency and oversight on very complex financial products (which still cannot be explained in most cases), to the hubris at AIG, we are living through a period of extraordinary transformation.

Lack of humility is a big problem in corporate America.  If you don’t have it, spend some time in the real world (perhaps you should go help Dick Grace build a hospital in an impoverished area in Tibet).  Whatever it takes, get humble and reflective.  Ask the tough questions.  Don’t sit comfortably with bad profits.  A lack of humility almost caused another Great Depression, but this time on a global scale.  It bankrupted an entire country (Iceland).

On the Bazaarvoice front, I believe our solution encourages humility through negative reviews.  You have nothing to be afraid of but having the data and the will to do something with it.  I have seen countless cases of initial shock to the negative, followed by the a-ha moment where the merchandiser realizes the reason they have such a high return rate with that product.  We are, after all, a digital reflection of offline word of mouth.  These are the conversations that people are having every day, like it or not (and you should like it – word of mouth drives your sales).  So have the humility to listen and do something about it.  Then have the wisdom to leverage it.

Transparency. The World Wide Web has brought us sites like Glassdoor.com, founded by Rich Barton, the founder of Expedia.  At Glassdoor.com, you have the ability to rate and review CEOs as well as report your salary information.  HR heads have reported the salary data as 90% accurate for large companies like Microsoft.  I learned about Glassdoor.com at Liberty Media’s NetLeaders event last year, where Rich was a speaker (his theme: everything – people, person, place, service, product, thing – that can be rated and reviewed will be).  The Web has also brought us TheFunded.com, where you can rate and review venture capitalists (and not without an uproar).

Obama embraces transparency.  Leveraging social media, he went straight to the people for his election campaign fundraising efforts, and raised more money, in small amounts, than any other candidate in history.  And now, as President, he is bringing social media to government.  He gets his share of criticism (such as not allowing visitors to comment on some of the government sites), but my belief is that the genie is out of the bottle.  Just like his campaign is being heavily studied, and will be imitated, so will his efforts for social media in government.  No one can question that he is racing through policy discussions, from stem-cell research to reform on Wall Street.  The pace of legislation is unprecedented in modern times.

With the Web, including blogging, Facebook, Twitter, Glassdoor.com, TheFunded.com, reviews, and so many other forces, leaders will be held accountable to a higher level of transparency.  The opaqueness of poor employee satisfaction (and ethics) on Wall Street is coming to an end, quickly.  This transparency will transform leadership as we have known it.  The command-and-control style, coming out of military training, is dying.

Connectedness. My daughter, who is now 4, will literally grow up on Facebook (or something like it), with a digital lifestream of connectivity to her friends.  When she is my age, 37, she will be able to jump to a different job at a much faster pace than my generation.  She will be connected globally to friends that she has known since childhood.  If she doesn’t like the company culture, her friends will know.  The level of transparency will be unlike anything we can imagine now.  As a result, the focus on leadership, management, and culture will be at a level that today we cannot imagine, as employee retention is already, today, often the most costly expense a company has.

Culture. Due to these themes, the importance of focusing on culture is greater than ever.  I’ll spare you our uniqueness here, and instead provide you with this reference to all of our blog posts that have been categorized under culture – there are many.  I spend around 15% of my time focused on culture, and I believe it is largely responsible for our success as a company.

Total Leadership. Stew’s book is the start of many initiatives to focus on the development of the whole person.  Although that may not directly help you sell or service more widgets (although it actually will raise performance), it will lead to greater retention, employee satisfaction, and, ultimately, productivity, in this era of transparency and connectedness.  Learn more at TotalLeadership.org (and check out TLTV).

Soul. The Corporation, a stirring documentary I watched 4 years ago, made me think hard about the soul of a corporation.  I’m a believer in karma, and the more successful we are, the more I focus on the nourishment of our company’s soul.  The Bazaarvoice Foundation is a part of that nourishment, but there is much more (such as the charity CEO speaker series Tony Capasso launched this year).

After speaking all day (both exhausting and exhilarating), Stew and I had the pleasure of hosting dinner at Tequilas, my favorite interior Mexican food in Philadelphia, with Glen Senk, CEO of client Urban Outfitters; Dmitri Siegel, head of Direct at Urban Outfitters; Fiona Dias, EVP of Partner Strategy and Marketing at GSI Commerce; and Dana Lasher, an old friend from CDnow (former VP of Sales and Marketing) that helped me design Coremetrics’ initial reports who is now an entrepreneur herself at get Ready girls, an affinity sportswear company.  It was a magical evening of discussion, and I passed along my endorsement of Total Leadership in the hopes of helping others.

I hope that this post encourages you to speak at your alma mater.  I have found it to be an incredibly reflective process, one of the most important leadership development activities that I do, and have really enjoyed the karma of it all.  To teach is to learn.

Brett Hurt The Word-of-Mouth Potential of Green Products in 2007 and Beyond

December 30th, 2006 by Brett Hurt Founder and CEO

GM's EV1, the first electric car to be produced since the 1930sI just finished watching Who Killed the Electric Car?, a documentary about General Motors and the failed EV1 car, the first electric car to be produced since the 1930s.  I will not get into the politics of the movie – you should watch it (or read that Wikipedia entry) and interpret the information as you see fit.  But I will say that I think that General Motors missed a phenomenal opportunity to both tap into a new wave of customer demand and create an incredibly powerful positive word-of-mouth movement that they sorely need.  This is important on so many levels, not the least of which is that the Millennials (the next generation of 100 million American consumers) are socially and environmentally conscious consumers (as I wrote about in October).

EV1s getting crushed after being taken back from their leaseesThe most insightful part of the movie, as it pertains to word of mouth as well as green products, is to watch the reaction of EV1 leasees (all EV1s were leased until GM proved the market potential) when they realize that they can not buy their EV1 under any condition.  They organize, they petition, they beg.  Big name actors like Mel Gibson, Tom Hanks, and all other EV1 leasees are turned down.  The organizers get together and offer to buy all of the cars for $1.9 million – their request goes with no answer (according to the movie).  After finding out that the EV1s are being destroyed, they stand outside of the GM parking lot where EV1s are being stored to watch over the cars to make sure that GM doesn't destroy any more.  They literally do this for months on a 24×7 basis.  Talk about love for a car!  It makes iPod owners look downright disloyal.  I guess that is because a car has such a big impact on your life as opposed to an iPod, and the EV1 leasees were so passionately focused on making an impact on the environment.  These consumers were a word-of-mouth revolution waiting to be leveraged by GM.  But, GM being short-term focused like so many companies that are incentivized to think that way due to the short-term nature of making your numbers for Wall Street analysts, completely misses the boat.  [Side note: this short-term focus was really crystallized for me by my friend, Derek Woodgate, who is a corporate futurist and the founder of The Futures Lab, in a discussion we had on why the corporate world needs futurists.  He has a great job, in my opinion, but more on that perhaps later.]

The Tesla is a well designed, fully electric sports carOne of the big critiques of the EV1, from a consumer perspective at that time, is the short distance that the car can travel on a full charge (only 55-75 miles on the first generation model, due to the early generation batteries used; but the movie states that the average American only drives 29 miles per day although it doesn't seem like the car was ever marketed to highlight that this range would be sufficient for some 90% of American drivers).  Another critique is the high production cost of $80,000 per vehicle when the lease payments would net around $34,000 to $44,000, obviously a money-losing proposition for GM.  But a former EV1 employee explains that once economies of scale kick in, from good marketing and availability in large metropolitan areas, the production costs would have fallen dramatically and battery technology would have rapidly improved.  This seems like a logical argument to me, especially considering the recent success of the Tesla, which can travel up to 250 miles on a full charge.  It also helps that the Tesla goes 0-60 in 4 seconds and looks like a well-designed sports car.  Unlike the EV1, which had a failed rollout (only leasing 800 units), the Tesla recently sold out their flagship 2007 model in just four months. 

I guess my point here is that GM could have figured it out if they stuck with it, and the consumer emotion evoked by the product was simply incredible.  And I think it is indisputable that GM missed the boat on the launch of hybrids relative to Toyota (who is projected to pass GM in 2007 as the world's largest producer of autos).  In the movie, one of GM's former Board members talks about his support of the EV1 project more from a R&D perspective, given the shift in consumer demand that he saw coming.  The success of hybrids and the launch of the Tesla prove that demand is there, if the marketing is well executed then word of mouth could have done the rest of the work.

What does all of this have to do with the title of my blog post?  Well, I predict that green products are going to be one of the hottest trends for the next decade.  They are ripe for an amazing level of positive word of mouth ("free marketing?").  Obviously coffee and universal access to global information also need little advertising when the product is great (Starbucks invested in their stores and locations, Google invested in the world's best search, and neither invested in advertising – positive word of mouth did that job for them).

There are more and more people that are accepting the consequences of global warming.  Just today, it was reported that another enormous ice shelf broke away in the Canadian Arctic.  As I first predicted in July of 2006, I wrote that the documentary An Inconvenient Truth would be marked as the most impactful documentary in modern history.  After seeing it a month ago for the first time, I have to admit that is a transformational movie.  You simply can't see it and not be emotionally moved by the implication of the evidence presented – it truly is "an inconvenient truth".  If you haven't seen it and want the quick "cheat sheet", this summary is a good place to start.  And 60 Minutes recently had a compelling report – here is an excerpt.

In August, I wrote about Wal-Mart embracing sustainability (and the rapid impact they could have given their immense scale).  And I recently learned (when having coffee with one of their heads of eCommerce) that they include a video on what they are doing about it with every copy of An Inconvenient Truth that they sell.  Here is an example of one of their recent initiatives, among many. 

From Millennials being more socially conscious consumers to Kleiner Perkins investing huge sums of money in alternative energy, there is something major under way here.  There is a shift in consumer demand that is just beginning to be felt (look at the Whole Foods stock rise that I wrote about when reporting on Wal-Mart and sustainability).  Wal-Mart, the largest company in the world, acting early on this shift is a wake-up call for smaller companies everywhere.

The bottom line is that I truly believe when we look back and assess the long-term economic impact of the events of 2006, it will be that the green movement got underway and rolled like a freight train through the economy for the next several decades.  And sparked consumer emotion and word of mouth that had never before been seen.  The stakes are simply too high and too broadly felt for it not to.

If you don't have a green strategy, I suggest you start moving now.  We'll see a lot more green (both green products and the money made off them) in 2007 and beyond.  We can help you rapidly evolve these products by tapping into word-of-mouth analytics and helping you learn what is really resonating (and what isn't) with your customers.

Update on Jan. 2:
I was just catching up on BusinessWeek while at the gym, and noticed that the "green" trend was highlighted in three different "ideas" for the "The Best Ideas of 2006", specifically:

The only other trend to have as many common ideas is that of user-generated content, a topic near and dear to Bazaarvoice and our clients.  Specifically: