Posts Tagged ‘negative-word-of-mouth’

Heather Brunner Word of Mouth Damage Control: Are You Prepared?

April 16th, 2009 by Heather Brunner Chief Operations Officer

This post was guest-written by Melissa Lipscomb, Bazaarvoice Community Manager

Does your company have a disaster recovery program for negative word of mouth?

Over the Easter weekend, social networking sites and blogs exploded with negative publicity about online retailing giant Amazon.com. Angry customers are protesting changes on Amazon’s site that lost sales ranking data for hundreds of books dealing with homosexuality, meaning that these books can no longer be found via keyword or subject searches or on best-seller lists.

twitter-logojpg

Amazon appears to have been taken by surprise by the outrage – #amazonfail was the top-trending term on Twitter, and a Google bomb initiated by a popular blog for romance readers successfully redirected searches for “Amazon rank” to a snarky explanation of the issue before Amazon responded at all.

The initial response was a terse press release explaining that the de-rankings were the result of a “glitch” in the sales-ranking feature. A skeptical public declined to believe this explanation, which is widely perceived as a cover-up for a change in corporate policy – or an overzealous application of the existing policy. And it seems likely that Amazon’s customer service reps are being flooded with angry calls and emails. A subsequent apology included a more detailed explanation that the glitch was due to “an embarrassing and ham-fisted cataloguing error,” but conspiracy theories continue to circulate in the blogosphere.

No doubt Amazon’s slow response was due in part to the holiday weekend. It also seems likely that they didn’t have a good plan in place for dealing with a grassroots campaign of this sort. Ironically, Amazon has been a trendsetter in leveraging positive word of mouth, but it seems they were unprepared for the way that negative publicity can also spread rapidly on the Internet.

No one likes to think that a technological glitch or a bad decision by a single employee could result in a PR firestorm. But if something like this happened to your company, what would you do to contain the situation and turn it around?

Here are some suggestions for managing negative word of mouth:

  • React quickly. Monitor user-generated content on your site, customer service complaints, and word of mouth in other venues. If you see a particular topic cropping up repeatedly, don’t delay. Proactively letting people know that you’re aware of the situation and that you’re actively seeking more information shows you care about your customers and that you’re eager to respond to their feedback. The Internet never sleeps! Identify an escalation point for issues that arise during off-hours so that your official response isn’t delayed until regular office hours.
  • Be as transparent as possible. If you don’t have answers yet, just say so. Your customers are smart enough to recognize vague prevarication, and they’ll appreciate your honesty. When you’ve identified the problem, give a clear, understandable explanation of what went wrong and how you’re going to fix it.
  • If you’re at fault, apologize. A clear admission of responsibility and a commitment to resolve the issue will go a long way towards counteracting the negative publicity.
  • Don’t rely on traditional media to get the word out. Leverage the same tools your detractors used to get your story out there. Post about it in your corporate blog, tweet about it, and educate customer service reps on how to engage with your customers on social networking sites.

All companies hope they never have to deal with such backlash, but customer feedback – positive and negative – is valuable, and it’s critical to not just listen, but to act.

Brett Hurt The Challenge of Firing ‘Bad’ Customers

July 10th, 2007 by Brett Hurt Founder and CEO

A very angry customerYou have probably heard the recent story about Sprint Nextel firing 1,000 of their highest maintenance customers. CNET’s News.com covers the story, and the reader discussion is very active with 125 comments so far. You can also easily find this article by searching for “Sprint customer service” on Google, where it is currently the sixth match on the first page of Google’s search results. Actually, two of the top ten matches are this story, and three of the ten (two individual blogs and one article at MSN Money) are very negative commentary about Sprint customer service.

Now, I have nothing against Sprint. But I find it fascinating that in this day and age the way we consume information is so dependent upon Web search results. We spend more time consuming media online than in any other medium. If you are considering Sprint as a customer and searching for “Sprint customer service” on Google to learn about the experience you may have with them, 30% of the first ten matches are negative and 20% are about them firing high maintenance customers.

(more…)

Brett Hurt Netflix vs. Blockbuster: Round Three

January 17th, 2007 by Brett Hurt Founder and CEO

According to TechCrunch, Blockbuster has been very successful with their "Total Access" offering, which I wrote about in my round two post on Netflix vs. Blockbuster.  Apparently they attacked Netflix where it hurts (the immediacy of movie delivery), and it has resulted in Blockbuster growing their online membership by 700,000 over the last two and a half months to a total of 2.2 million.  Netflix has 6 million subscribers, by comparison.  For the first time since I started writing about this in February of last year, Blockbuster is worth close to the same amount as Netflix ($1.25 billion versus $1.56 billion, respectively).  Blockbuster's stock rose from a low of around $3.8/share in late October to today's $6.57/share.  I'm not sure if Blockbuster reads this blog or not, but they did something right!  They have added $527 million of market value in the last four months while Netflix has basically plateaued in value over the same time period. 

 Netflix introduces "Watch Now" 

(more…)

Brett Hurt Netflix vs. Blockbuster: Round Two

December 6th, 2006 by Brett Hurt Founder and CEO

Because of the power of negative word-of-mouth, and the ability for Netflix to leverage the “bad profits” that Blockbuster had been collecting from its customers for late fees, round one of Netflix vs. Blockbuster was a total knockout. I wrote about this in February (and first referenced the concept of bad profits for this blog) and then revisited the battle in June and in my most recent post on bad profits a few weeks ago.

Blockbuster.com Total Access graphic
Round two is getting a little more interesting, as Blockbuster finally starts to leverage their stores to create a potentially more positive word-of-mouth offering. In today’s Wall Street Journal, Blockbuster announced that they are letting subscribers of Netflix rent movies for free through Dec. 21 by simply walking into one of their stores and redeeming the tear-off address flap from the signature red Netflix envelope for the free rental. This is a promotion for Blockbuster’s new “Total Access” feature, which lets customers return DVDs rented through its online service, which competes directly with Netflix, in their stores. Blockbuster announced Total Access in the November 1 edition of the Wall Street Journal with the following quote from their CEO:

“Customers shouldn’t have to choose between renting online versus in-store, and they should never have to be without a movie,” said Blockbuster Chairman and Chief Executive John Antioco in a statement.

This is a smart strategy as it enables Blockbuster to leverage something Netflix doesn’t have – 8,500 stores located across 29 countries. It will ultimately lead to some positive word-of-mouth for Blockbuster, and a new competitive differentiator against Netflix. I, for one, plan to try this out over the holidays as the only downside to my Netflix subscription is sometimes I don’t plan far enough ahead to have the movie I want when I want it.
Never be without a movie graphic from Blockbuster.com

However, it is hard to imagine that this will lead to a long-term competitive advantage for Blockbuster. The next wave that will hit is movie downloading, which will solve the only real challenge Netflix has (the wait time). And Netflix is planning to lead in that wave. Check out Reed Hastings’ recent interview on 60 Minutes. And don’t get me started on how great of a job Netflix does in creating high switching costs (or “community stickiness”) with all of its great ratings and social networking features. Even though I will try Blockbuster again as a result of this promotion, it is unlikely I will dump Netflix.

What is the lesson learned here? Leverage your multichannel assets, like Blockbuster is finally doing, to earn “good profits”, especially in the face of a competitor acting on your source of bad profits. This will help offset the negative word-of-mouth that your bad profits have generated with positive word-of-mouth. Also, reducing your sources of bad profits now will help prevent disruptive upstarts in the future. This is much harder to do than it sounds, and the book The Innovator’s Dilemma does the best job of any I have read in explaining why.

Update: I just saw that Reed Hastings won the “Innovator of the Year Award” from the NRF (National Retail Federation), the parent of Shop.org.

Brett Hurt Bad Profits and Enjoy the Free 411 Calls

December 1st, 2006 by Brett Hurt Founder and CEO

Earlier this year in February, I wrote about Blockbuster vs. Netflix. The main word-of-mouth lesson learned in that post was one of “bad profits“. Netflix simply took Blockbuster’s negative word-of-mouth regarding late fees and modeled their entire business model and ad campaign around it – “the end of late fees”. It worked, and Netflix took off like a rocket. As I wrote in February, Netflix was worth twice what Blockbuster was at the time. That situation hasn’t changed – Netflix is worth $2 billion today while Blockbuster is worth $1 billion (they are both trading higher due to the more robust stock market we are in). “Bad profits” create an opportunity for entrepreneurs or established companies to come along with a competing service that is highly disruptive.

Speaking of bad profits, I was especially intrigued this morning to read about my friends at 1-800-FREE-411 (Jingle Networks). TechCrunch reports that 1-800-FREE-411 has already received 100 million 411 calls! It has taken over 3% of the $8 billion 411 market. I know the CEO of this company (he founded Flycast with a fellow Wharton MBA graduate from my class), as well as their early investor Josh Kopelman, who is also an investor in Bazaarvoice and the founder of Half.com. I consider these two some of the smartest people I am fortunate enough to know. This is another stunning example of bad profits creating an incredibly huge and disruptive market opportunity. 1-800-FREE-411 has the easiest marketing slogan I have seen in a long time – everything you need to know is right there in the phone number. To learn more about what created this opportunity, check out Josh Kopelman’s great blog post.

There are so many recent examples of bad profits in action. Think of the incredibly disruptive Skype, which yesterday had over 8 million users online. The negative word-of-mouth from exorbitant long distance fees paved the way for Skype’s success. And, of course, everyone knows by now that eBay bought them for $2.6 billion.

Where are the bad profits in your industry and how can you capitalize on them?

Do you have any bad profits yourself? One example I can think of in retail is the difficulty of returns when you have a bad experience with a product. Costco capitalizes on that by providing unlimited returns on all items (i.e. buy a TV, save the receipt, and you can literally return it 2 years later if it breaks). Their only exception is for computers – there is a 6-month policy on those. I have been tracking Costco’s success for years to see if this incredibly customer-friendly policy would hurt them. Quite to the contrary, Costco has thrived as a result. I encourage you to read my friend Gary Stein’s blog for more analysis on Costco.

If you are a Bazaarvoice client, we suggest you measure your word-of-mouth promoters and detractors with our Net Promoter service. We haven’t promoted it as well as we should (we’ll change that), but it is truly powerful and will illuminate any potential sources of “bad profits” and word-of-mouth detractors.

And now enjoy the free 411 calls!